The Plan
First: We need to study sports
and see what we can learn from
them.
Young people are willing to
work so hard at sports they throw up
from exhaustion. Why is that? I think it is more than just love of
sports or
drive to win.
Why are students so willing to
work so hard for sports but not for
academics, or even money?
Maybe it is because kids
hunger for activities in which they
can engage in cooperative or (team) efforts in a competitive
environment in the
hopes of receiving some kind of recognition from both their peers and
their
society. My experience with STEM Camp seems to verify that hypothesis.
Last year several of our
campers had, at best, a casual if not
hostile attitude toward the camp. (I know one was forced by parents to
come and
another that was forced to come by his big brother, who attended the
year
before. ) We begin the camp with the Lego competition for the first two
days.
Basically we have four races, two each day. Most of them started with
half-hearted efforts. But by the end of the first day, attitudes had
noticeably
changed. Several asked when they could come the next morning. I replied
that we
begin at 8:00, but that I would be there at 7:30. When I arrived at
7:15 the
next morning there were nearly a dozen waiting to get in. We give them
snacks
at 10 and lunch at 11:30. Only a few stopped for snacks, and none of
them would
stop for lunch until, after telling them that lunch was ready three
times, in
exasperation the lady threatened to take away the food if they didn't
come
immediately. We were supposed to finish at 3 PM. We finally finished at
3:30,
over the objections of more than a few. They weren't done yet.
Since there was never any
emphasis on winning, and everyone
already knew that the prizes were just twelve dollar calculators, I
seriously
doubt that winning was the motivating factor. I think everyone was
simply
excited by cooperative engagement, the constant attention of coaches,
and the
act of competing.
Our k12 kids are drowned in
opportunities to engage in sports
activities every year from grades 3 or 4 clear through high school.
In order to increase the
number of students interested in
science and technology I believe we need to adopt the same strategy.
Three
questions spring forward immediately.
What are we to do, how much
will it cost, and , most
importantly, who are we going to get to do it?
Second, we need to formulate
a plan. I have one, here it is.
What should we do?
Do science activities with
third graders
Coach "mini lego league" for
grades 4 & 5 in
spring
Coach real First Lego League
(FLL) team for
grades 5 - 8 for state competition for
six weeks in fall.
Organize a First Tech
Competion (FTC) team for grades 7 - 10 and
perhaps even a FIRST Robotics Competition (FRC) team for grades 10
- 12.
How much will it cost?
Cost will be a major factor
for FTC and FIRST Robotics. Here
are the costs in round figures, which include robot kits and
registration fees,
with some added for miscellaneous costs.
"mini lego league" - a lego
mindstorm kit and a
computer,
both of which I am prepared to
provide for
free.
FLL - $500
FTC - $1500
FRC - $7000 - $10000, plus, a
professional engineer as a mentor is
required, deep pocket sponsors also highly recommended.
Why robotics competition?
Because of my personal
experience with the STEM camp lego
competitions and because of some case histories about Lego leagues.
(See
Appendix I for the whole nine yards.)
(Samples.)
Case Histories:
ÈJust 5 years ago, East
Tech, an
urban high school located in
the center of Clevelands
most
impoverished housing project
was slated for closing.
What FIRST opened up for
these students
can be seen in their achievements.Weve become the science/engineering
magnet
school for all the district. More students try out for the FIRST team than for
football and
basketball combined.
12 students, including 5
females,
representing the first class to experience four years in FIRST,
all from inner city
neighborhoods,
all received scholarships and went on to the following schools:
Case Western Reserve;
Cornell; MIT;
University of Dayton; Cleveland State; Air Force Academy;
Ohio State; Allegheny
College; Mount
Union College; Georgetown.
Mr. Jerome
Seppelt FIRST
Program Manager, East Technical High School, Cleveland,OH
Who should we get to do it? Well, what usually happens is
everybody sits around and
expects some teacher to come forward and do it, for nothing, simply
because
they Òenjoy what they are doing and are dedicated.Ó And many do. But
what
eventually happens to volunteer science programmers is that they get
burned out
and their spare time eventually dwindles to zero. I can just about
guarantee
that most sports coaches Òenjoy what they are doing and are dedicatedÓ,
but
nobody ever expects them to do it for nothing. In fact, many of them
get paid
more than teachers.
So let's review. Everyone
recognizes
the
importance
of sports in our young people's
lives and we pay to make certain sports programs persist, yet while
their
interest in STEM is as important, if not more, for the well being of
this
country, we leave STEM programs to the casual interest of occasional
teachers.
I
believe
we
should form a dependable science team (made up of community college
students)
to carry out these activities. The cost of a science team to serve our
service
area of 6 schools is about the salary of a single high school teacher.
Brief History of the Science
Team
This is the thirteenth year we
have had a science team at CACC. I
first got the idea for a science team at a national two year college
physics
teacher's meeting from a casual conversation with a friend, Marie Plum,
who
taught physics at a community college in New York State. She taught a
2-hour
course, organized and attended the third grade sessions with her
students.
My students find their own
third grade class, organize their own
schedule of 5 visits per semester, and make up about half of their own
activities. (The rest come from our box of tricks.) For this effort
they get a
polo shirt with their name on it and bonus points that amount to 3 % of
their
grade.